Femme enceinte et dentiste, attention aux métaux lourds Par Véronique Henry
by Neptunya | 11 décembre 2016 15 h 44 min
Si vous êtes dans votre 4éme ou 5éme mois de grossesses, vous avez le droit par l’assurance maladie de voir un dentiste tous frais pris en charge. Beaucoup de mamans sont très heureuse à l’idée d’y aller même si ce n’est pas très sympathique que de se faire triturer les dents et gencives.
Mais comme très souvent les futures mamans ont des gingivites, gencives qui saignent ou mal aux dents, elles se disent pourquoi pas y aller, cela ne me fera pas de mal, et mon bébé encore moins. C’est FAUX.
Certes un nettoyage, un état des lieux basique peut être une bonne idée. Une meilleure prise en charge avec conseils et brosse à dent adaptés pourquoi pas. Mais pour les gros travaux, remplacement de dents ou comblement, attendez de ne plus allaiter votre enfant.
Il fallait y penser avant, bien avant, quand on décide que l’on va faire un enfant, on se nettoie avant et on fait un état des lieux de tout le corps avec son naturopathe ou autres.
Se faire enlever une dent ou nettoyer une carie pendant la grossesse n’est pas une bonne idée, demander dans le cas contraire, une pose de résine plus cher mais moins de métaux lourds. http://neptunya.fr/amalgames-dentaires-et-intoxication-aux-mercure-ines-leraud-a-mene-lenquete/
Le mieux est de vous faire accompagner en homéopathie et en phytothérapie, pour mieux éliminer les possibles métaux lourds excrété pendant la dépose d’amalgame et/ou la pose en cas de carie.
Si vous avez les gencives qui saignent et mal au dents, je vous conseille de prendre du lithothamne, riche en calcium et magnésium dont vous et votre enfant avaient besoin.
A ceci, vous pouvez rajouter sans risque, du Strath en comprimés pour les personnes intolérantes au gluten, si vous avez eu des problèmes de fer, pensez au Salus-Floradix fer et plantes sans gluten ainsi qu’au Saludynam riche en calcium, magnesium et zinc.
ET bien sûr, si vous avez eu un cancer hormonodépendant, vous vous rendrez compte que beaucoup de compléments alimentaires se retrouvent être des pièges à hormones, cependant il y en a un qui convient particulièrement en vitamine prénatale, c’est Ergynatal de chez nutergia, une très bonne gamme.
Tout ces compléments alimentaires sont disponible sur le site de: maboutiqueonaturel.fr
Je vous dis cela, car vous pouvez comme moi et selon votre corps même en mangeant bio vous retrouver en carence car bébé à besoin de beaucoup de nutriments pour se construire et vous pour tenir 9 mois jusqu’au marathon qui vous attend pour la naissance.
Le besoin en est accru si en plus vous mangez mal avec peu de légumes et beaucoup de viande, et si vous mangez beaucoup de gluten, buvez beaucoup de lait et autres dérivés fromages, crème gruyères etc. Pas mal de maman font du diabète de grossesse à cause de leur alimentation dites impeccable.
Les envies et les pulsions ne sont pas difficiles à identifier, si vous avez envie de viande ou autres dérivés carnés= protéines, pareil si vous avez envie de fromage ou lait et dérivés= calcium, idem pour le chocolat=magnésium. Que vous soyez végétarienne ou pas, il faut traduire et ajuster votre alimentation de la bonne manière sans se gaver et succomber aux envies. (c’est le plus dur mais on y arrive;)
Étant donné que les aliments de maintenant en bio sont moins complet en nutriments qu’avant (merci la culture à grande échelle) mais plus riche qu’en magasin industriel, on a perdu en qualité et on se voit obligé de faire appel à des compléments alimentaires pour faire face.
C’est la vie d’aujourd’hui. On ne peut pas y faire grand chose. A part subventionner le bio local via nos achats, nos petits paysans et nos groupements de producteurs et magasins bio.
Alors voilà, je vais aussi dans un prochain article mettre en ligne tout ce que j’ai pu trouver sur comment se soigner de manière naturelle en étant enceinte.
LE CDC détruit les preuves de corrélation entre l’Autisme et le Vaccin du ROR
by Neptunya | 24 octobre 2016 18 h 52 min
Fautes monstrueuses dans mon article, j’ai mal relu veuillez m’en excuser!
Je vais vous retranscrire une partie de l’article relayé par Jon Rappoport au sujet de l’histoire vraie du CDC qui détruit des preuves sur la corrélation entre le vaccin ROR et l’autisme. D’un jeune homme autiste, d’un délateur qui ne va pas jusqu’au bout de sa dénonciation. Bref, de quoi faire un film documentaire sur cela en trailer au-dessus.
Il s’agit de l’histoire vrai d’un jeune enfant qui après avoir reçu le vaccin du R-O-R est devenu autiste comme tant d’autres. La famille crée un collectif, prend un avocat, et porte cela devant la justice. Le jeune homme a maintenant 16 ans (Yates Hazlehurst) bien sûr autiste, il n’arrivera jamais à se débrouiller seul.
Donc, ils sont une première fois déboutés par la justice et font appel du résultat et portent l’affaire devant le tribunal fédéral. Et là, ils ont un homme providentiel le DR William Thompson qui fait partie du CDC et qui accuse ces collègue et patron d’avoir détruit des résultats incriminant le vaccin ROR (qui contient du mercure mais aussi de l’aluminium) et les risques réels d’autisme et autres maladies neurologiques.
En 2015, manifestement par sursaut de conscience, le dénonciateur du CDC, William Thompson, a dit ceci au député Posey du Congrès: « En tant que maître de recherches au CDC, après avoir fait une étude sur le lien entre les vaccins et le taux d’autisme chez les petits garçons noirs, lui et ses collègues ont programmé une réunion pour détruire les documents se rapportant à l’étude. »
Les avocats adverses ont tout fait pour que son témoignage ne soit pas pris en compte. Car comme il travaille encore au CDC, il a une sorte de clause qui lui interdit de parler en gros, et je pense aussi que sa vie est menacée. De plus les coauteur de l’étude Coleen Boyle et Frank DeStephano sont tous deux des docteurs haut placé au CDC dans la sécurité des vaccins. Ils l’ont aidé à détruire l’étude de 2004 sur les implications du vaccin ROR et autisme, mais ne souhaitent pas témoigner.
A l’heure actuelle, le Dr thompson a pris un Avocat spécialisé dans ces affaires-là, de personnes travaillant pour l’administration et qui découvrent des malversations, falsifications, destructions de preuves etc. Mais dans son cas, il n’est pas sûr que cela aille très loin car il faut porter plainte contre son propre patron Le CDC. Et ni le Congrès bien qu’ayant mentionné qu’ils feraient une enquête n’iront au bout des choses et même s’ils le font, y aura-t-il une séance publique où tout serait dévoilé, non j’en doute. Ils ont trop peur, car cela remettrait en cause toutes leurs anciennes études, et porterait un sérieux coup de froid à l’intégrité du CDC.
En tout cas, c’est quand même le silence global sur la planète à propos de ce sujet. NI les médias, ni le Congrès américains, et encore moins le CDC ne veut que celle-ci ne s’ébruitent.
C’est pour cela que je souhaite vivement que vous partagiez mon petit article, en dessous se trouve l’article de Jon Rappoport (en américain) sans qui je n’aurais pas eu vent de cette histoire. Et prenez le temps d’aller sur le site du film documentaire de Vaxxed Je vais essayer de trouver le film. Lire aussi l’article suivant En Français: Sachez aussi que Robert de Niro à fait la présentation du film Vaxxed ou il défend le film 
By Jon Rappoport
Here are the bones of the story. For the first time in 30 years, a vaccine-damage case has gone before a court judge. Lawyers for a 16-year-old autistic boy are suing a medical clinic for administering vaccines that brought about the autism. The CDC, of course, denies any connection between vaccines and autism. But one of its own long-time researchers, William Thompson, has publicly confessed to fraud in that area. Thompson states that he and his colleagues concealed research data that would have shown the MMR vaccine and mercury-laden vaccines do cause autism. The lawyers for the 16-year-old boy want to bring in Thompson to testify about what he knows. The CDC has said NO. The head of the CDC, Thomas Frieden, states, « Dr. William Thompson’s deposition testimony would not substantially promote the objectives of CDC or HHS [the Department of Health and Human Services]. »
Well, he’s right, because the CDC is the PR arm of the vaccine industry. The CDC is a major purchaser of vaccines for the US federal government. If this boy won his case, other cases would follow. The potential monetary exposure in judgments? A trillion dollars or more.
Ecowatch.com has the details:
« The medical malpractice case seeking Dr. Thompson’s testimony is on behalf of 16-year-old Yates Hazlehurst. The lawsuit alleges that Yates is autistic as a result of vaccine injuries, which occurred when the vaccines were improperly administered in 2001. Because of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act of 1986 (VICA), Hazlehurst v. The Jackson Clinic is the only vaccine injury case that has gone to any U.S. court in 30 years. »
« Dr. Thompson wants to reveal the scientific fraud and destruction of evidence that took place in the studies that he co-authored. However, in accordance with the Whistle Blower Protection Act and other federal regulations, Dr. Thompson can not testify under oath without the permission of the director of the CDC, Dr. Thomas Frieden. »
« The request on behalf of Hazlehurst specifically relates to the issue of causation, i.e. the issue of whether vaccines can cause autism, which the State of Tennessee Circuit Court Judge found to be both relevant and a proper basis for seeking the deposition of Dr. Thompson. »
« Judge Acree ordered on Feb. 5 that Dr. Thompson should be deposed. Following Judge’s Acree’s ruling, Smith [Bryan Smith, the boy’s attorney] filed a formal request to CDC to make Thompson available for deposition and trial testimony. »
« On Sept. 22, in a letter from CDC Director Thomas Freiden, CDC denied Smith’s request. Smith explained that ‘this denial was a disappointment but not a surprise, since the inescapable implication of Dr. Thompson’s testimony is that the agency fraudulently altered the science to undermine autism cases worth potentially $1 trillion in compensation ordered by Congress’. »
« Smith and Kennedy [Robert F Kennedy, Jr., the boy’s other attorney] plan to immediately appeal the CDC’s denial to federal court. »
William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, is the subject of the film Vaxxed. Thompson has admitted publicly that he and his CDC colleagues literally threw damning data into a garbage can, to avoid reaching the conclusion, in a 2004 study, that the MMR vaccine raises the risk of autism in children.
His testimony in court would be explosive, to say the least.
Since he is still employed by the CDC, his bosses can keep him out of court. They can muzzle him. They can threaten him. No doubt, Thompson has also signed non-disclosure agreements with the Agency.
How far would the federal government go to silence Thompson, who could open a Pandora’s box containing a trillion dollars in potential judgements? All the way is the obvious answer.
The implications of Thompson’s testimony involve much more than money: the massive destruction of lives through vaccinations. That is ultimately the crime of crimes at the bottom of the cover-up.
And the CDC would be rightly seen as a primary agent in both the crimes and the cover-up.
If the US Department of Justice had any sense of honor, or courage, scores of CDC employees would be in jail right now.
And if major media outlets had any sense of honor, or courage, they would be swarming all over the CDC, hammering on many employees and obtaining confessions from them, releasing the rank truth about vaccines from the Agency’s offices and labs of shame.
Autre article lié à ce sujet:
My previous article, « CDC commits new vaccine-autism crime, » details the CDC’s refusal to allow its own researcher and chief whistleblower, William Thompson, to testify in a court case involving a boy who was severely damaged by vaccinations.
Therefore, it’s time to remember William Thompson—again. Here are excerpts from two articles I wrote before the stunning film Vaxxed was released. Vaxxed is all about Thompson’s revelations and their implications.
(August 2015)…William Thompson, long-time CDC researcher, publicly admitted he hid evidence that indicted the MMR vaccine for its connection to autism.
It’s been a year since Thompson publicly accused his colleagues at the CDC of doing the same thing. Two of those colleagues, Frank DeStefano and Collen Boyle, are high-ranking CDC executives in the area of vaccine safety.
During this past year, mainstream reporters and defenders of the realm have taken two approaches: silence; and vague claims that Thompson’s statements are false.
Both of these approaches are slimy and disingenuous, because the man we want to hear from is Thompson himself. And we have not.
We want to hear from him in a public setting, in front of a hearing where he can speak at length, where he can fill in details, where he can air all his claims without censorship.
At the moment, the possibility of such a hearing is remote, because the US Congress is bought and sold.
Short of a hearing, we want Thompson to sit down with a reporter and speak on camera, extensively, and submit himself to questions.
He has said he will not do this. He and his lawyer, Rick Morgan, know there are a number of reporters who will do a proper interview, without edits. I could easily name a dozen reporters who would conduct an in-depth interview, live, online, for the whole world to see.
What if there never is a full-blooded open Congressional hearing? What then? Will Thompson maintain silence for the rest of his life?
More is at stake here than the danger of the MMR vaccine. The CDC has done hundreds of key studies on vaccine safety. They are all thrown into doubt by Thompson’s assertion— recently quoted by Congressman Bill Posey on the floor of the Congress—that Thompson and his colleagues brought a garbage can into a CDC office and threw out documents that would have shown the MMR connection to autism.
This speaks of a massive indifference to human life and safety.
Thompson should also know, and certainly does know, that Congressional hearings have a way of soft-pedaling accusations against government agencies. There is no guarantee that, in such a setting, he would be able to air his confession and his grievances in full.
Whereas, in an interview with independent investigators/reporters, he would have complete latitude. Time constraints would not apply. He would be asked for many, many details. The full story, from his point of view, would emerge.
It is my conclusion that Thompson entered into an arrangement with his bosses at the CDC. After his public confession of a year ago, it was too late to put the genie back in the bottle and cork it. But damage control could be undertaken.
Thompson could say (and he did) that he was willing (and only willing) to work with Congress to present the truth. His CDC bosses were confident they could, with the help of powerful friends in government and in the pharmaceutical industry, prevent Congressional investigation and exposure.
And if Thompson maintained silence otherwise, refusing to talk to reporters, he would be off the hook.
The CDC assured Thompson that he could continue to work for them and retire and receive his full pension.
That’s my conclusion. If I’m in error, let Thompson or his lawyer, Rick Morgan, correct me.
Beyond Thompson’s public confession, there are taped phone calls between him and Brian Hooker and Andrew Wakefield. In these fragments, Thompson expresses his outrage about the use of mercury in vaccines. He makes other damning statements about vaccines.
These statements should also be the springboard for an in-depth interview with Thompson, on camera.
Then there is the matter of a 2004 letter Thompson wrote to the head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding. He informed Gerberding that he had data about the MMR vaccine that was very sensitive and troubling. He was surely referring to the suppressed truth about the MMR-autism connection. Thompson was about to present these data at a major CDC vaccine conference
Apparently, Gerberding never answered the letter and instead stonewalled Thompson. His presentation was cancelled. But some five years later, when she left the CDC, Gerberding went to work for Merck as the president of their vaccine division…
And Merck does, in fact, manufacture the MMR vaccine.
What are the odds that this potential stick of dynamite would be permitted to explode during an open Congressional hearing, with Gerberding on the stand under oath?
The likelihood is on the level of the full moon turning into a cowboy on a horse in full view of the whole world.
So we have the silence of the Congress, the silence of the major media, and the silence of Thompson himself.
I have no doubt he fears for his life. On the other hand, can he maintain invisibility forever?
At stake is the severe neurological damage caused by the MMR and other vaccines.
The pretense of major media in all this is preposterous. After 30 years of working as a reporter, I know what makes a story. I know that a major researcher (which Thompson is) at a major government agency (the CDC), admitting to gross fraud in an area as charged as vaccines, is, without further ado or parsing, a blockbuster, a page-one headline. There is absolutely no doubt about it.
We aren’t talking about somebody coming in from the outside and claiming the CDC is cooking their research books. No, this is a house man, a valued member of the research club, blowing the whistle on himself and his highly placed colleagues, at considerable risk to himself.
This is already a huge story, without taking another step.
To achieve the stunning media silence, there was active repression and widespread collusion and pressure, and lies told and excuses made.
In retrospect, we can understand why a major push for mandatory vaccination has been launched. Thompson was cutting close to the bone with his revelations. Alternative news sites were bristling with stories exposing the dangers of vaccines. The powers-that-be decided it was time to double down.
It was time to overwhelm the noise and go all-out. It was time to pass new laws eliminating vaccine exemptions, and it was time to hurl waves of vicious accusations against truth tellers.
The Thompson case remains in limbo. Will he ever speak out and spill all the secrets? Will he emerge from the shadows?
This isn’t over. It’s far from over.
—here is my follow-up article about Thompson—
Bombshell: CDC destroyed vaccine documents, Congressman reveals; CDC whistleblower case is back (July 2015)
« …the [CDC] co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the [MMR vaccine-autism] study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. » (William Thompson, CDC researcher)
On July 29, US Congressman Bill Posey made his last stand on the floor of the House. Granted five minutes to speak, he laid bare the lying of the CDC in a now-famous 2004 study that exonerated the MMR vaccine and claimed it had no connection to autism.
« No connection to autism » was the lie.
Congressman Posey read a statement from long-time CDC researcher William Thompson, one of the authors of the 2004 Pediatrics study designed to determine, once and for all, whether the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine could cause autism.
Thompson saw and participated in violating the protocol of the study. He helped his co-authors destroy documents that would have shown an MMR-autism link.
Of note: two of the CDC researchers on the infamous 2004 study, who according to Thompson, destroyed vital documents, are Coleen Boyle and Frank DeStephano. They are both high-ranking executives at the CDC in the area of vaccine safety.
This calls into question every single CDC study, under their tenure, that claims vaccines are safe.
CDC whistleblower Thompson’s statement, which Posey read on the House floor, includes this bombshell: « However, because I [Thompson] assumed it [destroying the documents] was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper. »
Thompson has the smoking-gun documents. So does Congressman Posey. I believe others do as well.
There are lawsuits to be filed. Eleven years have passed since the CDC committed its crime of concealing the MMR vaccine-autism connection. How many parents, never informed of the truth, have permitted their children to receive this vaccine? How many children have been struck down by the vaccine?
The lawsuits should be filed against the CDC and the individual authors of the 2004 study. Lawyers must depose every CDC employee who had knowledge of the crime.
And what about the fact that the MMR vaccine is one of the shots that has been mandated, by law, in California, in other states, and in Australia? Mandating neurological destruction of children is a crime that must be investigated and punished. If these states (and other countries) insist on keeping the MMR on their schedules, they are guilty parties.
Understand what we are dealing with here, in terms of public exposure: the author of a peer-reviewed and published study; the author who has worked for many years at the CDC; the author who participated in destruction of vital documents; the author has come forward and admitted his crime and the crime of his colleagues. This kind of confession never happens.
But it did happen.
And this story and what it means must not die, no matter how major media outlets try to spin it or ignore it.
Parents who are, in ignorance, allowing their children to receive the MMR vaccine, must be informed. They must know what is going on. They must know the danger to their children.
Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, Germany, France, India, China, South Africa…wherever the MMR vaccine is given…parents must be made aware they’re gambling with their children’s lives.
Government officials anywhere in the world who make this continuing crime possible are liable.
So are manufacturers of the MMR.
—end of article—
My final comments for now: William Thompson retained the services of a well-known whistleblower attorney, Rick Morgan, in 2014. Because Thompson admitted to a crime then, and also accused several of his colleagues of the same crime (gross fraud), he was blowing a whistle. But notice that his lawyer hasn’t filed a whistleblower lawsuit against the government. Why not?
Usually, those suits are filed when an employee of a corporation receiving a federal contract observes cheating, lying, falsification in the work of his company, and alerts the government that its money is being wasted.
But here we have a government employee, Thompson, accusing his own government agency of a crime. A suit could be filed, but the chances of it moving forward are very slim, because the Dept. of Justice, without giving a reason, can simply decide to let the matter drop. Then it’s dead in the water.
Thompson knows this. So does Rick Morgan, his lawyer. The « whistleblowing » situation here is all about protecting Thompson from government retaliation, in the form of firing, possible penalties for violating non-disclosure agreements, and cancelation of his pension.
From available evidence, no lawsuit against the government is planned. Thompson has said he would work with Congress, if an investigation and hearing were launched. But that’s it. Other than that, he states he will remain silent. Presumably, he believes that Congress could give him protection from government retaliation.
More likely, as I’ve stated above, Thompson believes he will never have to break his silence again, because a Congressional investigation will never get off the ground.
Guilt-ridden in 2014, and realizing his confessional phone conversations with Brian Hooker and Andrew Wakefield had been taped, he stepped out into the light for a brief moment, and then retreated into the shadows.
That’s where he stays; a self-confessed felon, having accused his colleagues of the same felony, isolated, still working at CDC (now in the HIV/AIDS unit), miles away from anything having to do with vaccine safety.
Unless a federal judge in a case involving vaccine damage orders him to testify to what he knows, Thompson will make no public appearances. Even if a judge does issue that order, the CDC will do everything possible to deny Thompson a day in court. The ensuing inter-branch wrangle could go on for years.
This is why the film, Vaxxed, is so important. It does what Thompson would do, if he threw caution to the winds. The film lays out the case for intense corruption at the CDC vaccine section. In the process, it exposes sick government manipulations on behalf of the medical cartel that mark our time.
le site du film documentaire de Vaxxed : http://vaxxedthemovie.com/
Sachez aussi que Robert de Niro à fait la présentation du film Vaxxed ou il défend le film : http://reseauinternational.net/robert-de-niro-et-lautisme-un-terrible-drame-de-lintimidation/